Every time I speak somewhere, people ask me what I think scares Google the most. Is it Microsoft? Abandonment of net neutrality? Some new startup that will out-Google Google? While those are all indeed worth attention, and while I do not speak for Google in this blog, my biggest fear is that Google could become a big company.
I don’t mean big just in terms of headcount. Google has grown at a staggering pace as the company has added amazing talent to offices around the world allowing for even more cool products to get built. Yet, as the company gets bigger, the temptation is to introduce additional layers of management and bureaucracy and these are the enemies of innovation.
I have worked with engineers from a variety of household-name big companies. Like some universal truth that transcends language, national borders, industries, or even market cycles, I hear the same two things from those in organizations that are no longer innovating: 1) They never get to work on teams smaller than 200 people and 2) They haven’t launched anything in years. Why? They are suffocated by myriad processes, hierarchies, templates, forms, and flow charts.
The leaders of Google have realized, from the earliest days, that the company’s own growth would be the biggest challenge and have toiled unflinchingly to build scalable and transparent systems for encouraging the freedom to innovate and collaborate without jumping through some of the unnecessary traditional company hoops. I deeply respect the team that runs Google for focusing on this from the beginning and emphasizing it as a core company value.
Nevertheless, the potential big company pitfalls are always looming. As the size grows, I see colleagues, particularly those who join Google from other companies, tempted to carve out fiefdoms and mandate SWOT analyses and extensive Excel spreadsheets littered with three letter acronyms. I have seen a few mid-level bosses evoke the traditions of Japanese management and schedule “pre-meetings” to plan, discuss, and approve what will be planned, discussed and approved at the actual meeting itself. MBA-speak creeps into the parlance and these new managers require the filing of more and more TPS reports.
The good news? Google’s culture of letting engineers and product folks build great stuff that users want is still winning the day. However, the company needs to remain vigilant and never hesitate to clear the way for inspired people to create the products we all love. For those of you from Google who read my blog, thanks in advance for your help in keeping it a place where freedom to innovate is the rule and not the exception.
Have you read Shona Brown's book on _Competing on the Edge_? (Recently mentioned in the Fortune Magazine article on chaos at Google and a very interesting read.) In the framework of structured chaos she describes, you do need a few rules to keep everyone going in the same direction, but limit their number to a minimum set to allow creativity.
I don't think rules are bad per se. But you need to keep the focus on end products, not processes.
Posted by: Gabor | November 07, 2006 at 01:16 AM
I actually have read Shona's book and she is one of the company leaders I refer to above with deep respect. I think Shona has been a pioneer of very successful techniques that allow for rapid growth while maintaining sufficient order to hold it together.
I don't think innovation requires anarchy. Not at all. But, that said, I think there are very material distinctions between bureaucracy for bureaucracy's sake, and a well-devised, light-touch, evolving operational framework that helps everyone succeed.
When I first joined Google years ago, I will admit that I didn't really understand Shona's role. However, as Google has grown, her contributions become clearer and clearer to me and it is increasingly obvious that they really do underpin the culture of innovation we enjoy today.
Posted by: Chris Sacca | November 07, 2006 at 08:10 AM
Sacca, you nailed it. Our company has been hiring and promoting Bill Lumbergs. While I do not mind coming in on Sunday, I am not cool with the new cover sheets on our TPS reports. I did not get the memo and I am keeping this red stapler.
Engineers used to run Google. Much less so now. I hope you can fix it.
Posted by: Peter | November 07, 2006 at 07:12 PM
Thank you for having the balls to not just type this stuff but stir the pot at work. I like knowing you are around there trying to keep things real.
Posted by: Cowardly Googler | November 11, 2006 at 10:14 PM
Pre-meetings. *shudder*
Standing on the outside looking in, I often wonder how Google keep their culture in the midst of that massive growth. It's interesting to hear how seriously Google are taking the problem.
Posted by: Alan Green | November 19, 2006 at 03:24 PM
TypeKey/TypePad :
How can I receive it ! ..
Posted by: LeeTaeChil | November 21, 2006 at 02:49 AM
In my experience there isn't much of a problem yet with Lumbergs. But I've seen the sheer bigness of Google start to corrupt what even smart teams are doing.
I know of one project where the PM -- a longtime Googler -- has become infatuated with his own ideas to generate synergy across Google products. Before his product has even launched!
It's non-Googly. Products which rely on synergy don't focus on kicking ass. People pin their hopes on spillover from Google's other offerings.
The good thing about Google is that if a team loses focus, they will bleed engineering talent and top management will eventually crucify them. I hope that never changes.
Posted by: G for Googler | November 21, 2006 at 08:25 AM
If you think that Google can continue to grow and keep it's small company ethics you are kidding yourself.
Having experienced working for a company that grew a hundredfold overnight I know that you can't just stick your head in the sand and just wish that you were small again.
Big companies have big responsibilities and someone has to be there to steer the ship away from the iceberg and be prepared to pick up the pieces when it goes wrong and at the same time make sure the electricity bill is paid.
Someones has got to be there to assign the task that no one wants to do but nevertheless has to be done; and be able to tell the genius that their pet project is a waste of time instead of everyone pussy footing around claiming it is not their problem.
That having been said it is not a given that to be a big company you have to sell your soul - but to continue to develop you have to evolve.
Once a company has reached the stage where you have people who don't know and have never met the principals you have already lost that small time advantage.
Already Google has to be careful what it says because there are people just waiting to jump on every off the cuff remark.
History is littered with good engineering companies that failed to evolve.
Like any football team filled with the best players in the world, left to run themselves without good management they would be squabbling and bottom of any league.
In the words of Gil Scott-Heron 'since change is inevitable we should direct the change rather than simply continue to go through the change.'
To do that Google need to realise that it isn't one or the other but the goal is to strive for the perfect blend where good managers have the confidence to act in the background and harness the available talent and keep that talent focused on what is important. I think someone in Google probably already knows that.
Have fun growing!
Posted by: Martin Day | January 04, 2007 at 05:39 AM
What do you think about the Viacom vs. YouTube lawsuit?
Posted by: valtrex online | February 22, 2010 at 11:31 AM
yes I got it :)
Posted by: Texas holdem Strategies | April 03, 2010 at 06:25 PM
Well said, such a person should be a good sentence, or the future will be more rampant.
Posted by: abercrombie uk | July 25, 2010 at 10:58 PM
houghts on aerodynamic stabilization? What would a white sail with blue wedge lined by silver look like? Real pretty I recon!! Is this design known as the flying wedge?
Posted by: Abercrombie and fitch london | July 26, 2010 at 09:39 PM
In my experience there isn't much of a problem yet with Lumbergs.
Posted by: ed hardy outlet | July 29, 2010 at 12:28 AM
Notice that the Chinese know how to do a stimulus package, while no one in power seems to know how to do a stimulus package here in the US.
Posted by: abercrombie | August 01, 2010 at 08:17 PM
The fate of the heart is romantic dreams, thoughts on heart is fragrant memories, friendship is the sweet heart rhythm, the music you record in the heart is sweet beauty, a salute alcohol or, eternal friendship remains and permanent wish everlasting friendship! Wish you happy every day!
Posted by: New Balance Shoes | September 24, 2010 at 05:52 PM
excellent work yaar i too loved it........
the goal is to strive for the perfect blend where good managers have the confidence to act in the background and harness the available talent and keep that talent focused on what is important.
Posted by: generic avandia | October 11, 2010 at 08:04 AM
firm and difficult to see nowadays companies that work like google, more like a friend said above, it is important to always keep the focus on work, even if the site emrpesa not rigid rules.
Posted by: lisat telefônica | October 14, 2010 at 06:55 PM
Nonvilence is agreatest idea ever created by people. I am Buddhist and agree with you.
Posted by: generic viagra | October 19, 2010 at 09:25 PM
Notice that the Chinese know how to do a stimulus package, while no one in power seems to know how to do a stimulus package here in the US.
http://www.sundrugstore.com
buy Viagra
Posted by: buy viagra | October 21, 2010 at 02:33 AM
Today has been very special to me because today I got a job starting, I think having the opportunity to read this article makes me much better day than it already was, I believe that this information is great, very helpful for many people, no doubt help others in their various daily tasks. On behalf of all who read blogs thank you very much.
Posted by: Cheap viagra | October 21, 2010 at 12:43 PM
Love is a feeling, not only on the material to meet, but also to the spiritual care and stick
aa
Posted by: abercrombie milano | October 29, 2010 at 08:18 AM
Your voice so nice, but at the moment but let me so abhor! Just used? What a perfect answer, how lazy answer, how random explanation, it isn't you! Vibram Fivefingers Shoes / black yello Kso shoesWhy in this moment I don't know you? Still, I live in from me in the drama, I became a joke, the dummist joke, but you still obedient accompany me to play, I, I think at this moment, the perfection of the original saddan-less vertex really is happy, sad start from the beginning I hope bound to be disappointed, "habit" enough killing all my love Vibram Fivefingers Shoes / lilac classic shoes, my love so perfect but hurt so helpless, I always one-man part must firmly, I became the most ridiculous that!
Posted by: vibram.us | October 31, 2010 at 12:56 AM
I would like to appreciate the great work done by You
Please continue posting like this
Posted by: Generic Cialis | November 24, 2010 at 02:13 AM
I'd like to point out that we have a shiny, black T-bird convertible for sale with your name written all over it.1
Posted by: essay help | November 26, 2010 at 03:58 AM
It is very usefull information for every one..
http://www.gemsdrugstore.com/
Posted by: Account Deleted | December 06, 2010 at 04:50 AM